feedme1Systematic Theology. Exegesis. Church History. Contextualization. Liturgy. Pneumatology. Hebrew and Greek. Pastoral counseling. These are all subjects that most pastors are either familiar with or have taken seminary courses on. Transitioning from seminary to pastoral ministry is pretty crazy. You go from writing huge papers on how postmodernism challenges the epistemological assumptions of one’s praxis to writing sermons for diverse groups of people that range from being forced to attend to those who have been followers of Jesus for longer than you have been living. Try crafting a sermon for that type of audience versus your seminary classmates!

After some time, you’ll hit your stride and some experience will help you exegete your audience in a helpful way. You’ll start writing sermons that are Christ exalting and applicable and people will be really encouraged and challenged by your ministry.

And then you’ll talk to someone who tells you that your preaching doesn’t do anything for them.

Your first instinct will be to either punch them in the face, laugh nervously, cry, or quit. If you are wise, you’ll remember James 1:19 and will do your best to listen, be slow to respond, and slow to anger. Of course, the vision of choking that person out may be tempting, so it needs to be constrained by the teachings of Jesus in the Sermon on the Mount.

Over the years I’ve heard this statement a couple of times and I’ve talked to a lot of other pastors who have also heard this or similar statements. Here are three observations I have about people who say these things:

(1) You need to understand how to properly evaluate whether or not your sermons are “feeding the sheep.” I fear that some pastors are more concerned with keeping their congregations happy than with keeping their congregations fed. But most of the pastors that I know are very concerned with being faithful in what they teach/preach. Yet there’s something very peculiar about how devastating one person’s criticism can be! We will actually take that one person’s opinion and elevate it above and beyond the dozens or even hundreds of other people who think differently.

After encountering the “you-don’t-feed-me” person, you may even find yourself canceling sermon plans you’ve had and jumping to the conclusion that you need to preach totally different than what you’ve been doing. After all, someone told you that you aren’t feeding them!

It isn’t necessarily wrong to consider making changes, but your concerns should primarily be in regards to how God feels about the matter. Are you talking about the “whole counsel of God” (Acts 20:27)? Are you faithfully preaching the word (2 Tim. 4:2)? Is your preaching focused on exalting Christ, clarifying the gospel, and helping form the spiritual lives of those you serve? Questions like these are far more important.

So should you do a series that addresses marriage and serves the majority of your congregation or do a series on the “deeper” things of God like the “revelation of God’s seven spirits and how this all proves both the pretribulational rapture and young earth creationism.” While the former may not meet everyone’s alleged needs (though it’ll meet most), the latter is a complete waste of your time. Yes, I did just say that a sermon on the seven spirits of God proving the pretribulational rapture and young earth creationism is vastly inferior in comparison to doing a sermon on what God has to say about marriage. More on this…

(2) What people often want you to “feed” them is simply a way for them to reinforce their stereotypes and bad theology. I’m not kidding about this one. As I already alluded, those who talk about not being fed will generally give you ideas of what would feed them. In my experience, these suggestions are generally not related to primary doctrinal subjects (e.g., Christology, the gospel, missions) or the “main and the plain.” Most of the time these requests for “depth” are on things so speculative that you won’t find any theologians throughout the history of the church who have addressed them!

Of course, the kind of person that says “your sermons don’t feed me” has zero time for church history and believe that the reason why no one has talked about their favorite subject is simply because no one in the history of the church has been either smart enough or spiritual enough to know those things. Oh, and by the way, you are obviously not smart enough or spiritual enough to know about it either, which is why they are informing you that you haven’t “fed” them.

Pay close attention here. What these people often want is for you to reinforce what they already believe, no matter how disconnected from life or how unbiblical their beliefs are. I had a person once tell me that they wanted me to do sermons on why Christians who used Christmas trees was sinful idol worship!!! The fact that they were mishandling Scripture to “prove” this novel position didn’t matter to them at all. But when I couldn’t agree with their horrific eisogesis of Jeremiah 10:2-4, they left our church with no discussion and response to the questions I had. After all, I wasn’t into “depth.”

(3) The person who says they get nothing from a sermon is likely a prideful person. Pride is almost always the sine qua non of this statement. In other words, without pride, people rarely say that they aren’t getting anything out of a sermon. I say almost and rarely because I will acknowledge that there are some preachers out there that could stand to be better teachers and spend more time in preparation or be aware of the needs of their congregation. But by and large, the statement that someone isn’t getting anything from your sermons is a sign of pride. If you are publically reading portions of Scripture à la 1 Tim. 4:13 and preaching Christ à la Rom. 16:25, there’s something for people to be encouraged by and learn from.

In my experience, 99.9% of the time, this statement is being made by someone who is unteachable. So you need to be aware of the fact that all of the discussion and attempts to evaluate your teaching and ministry are almost always a waste of time simply because the person assumes they know more than you and are more spiritual than you. So it’s fruitless.

Except for when it isn’t, ha ha!


  •  How would you respond to someone saying this to you?
  • Do you think it’s a waste of time to try and engage people who say this?
  • What are other reasons that people may say this?
  • For those who have serious concerns about the teachings in their church, how can they best address those concerns?
Facebook Comments Box
Join My Mailing List

Join My Mailing List

Stay up to date on my latest biblical, theological, and pastoral resources, as well as what I'm currently reading or have found helpful for the week! 

You have successfully subscribed! Stay tuned for some sweet resources coming your way once a week!

Share This