The exact nature of how Scripture functions as an authority for the church has long been a source of debate. The issue only seems to have become more intense with the onset of post-modern epistemology. How do those with a high view (inerrancy) to answer the challenges that are being raised by today’s world, from both outside and within the church.
This is Vern S. Poythress’ focus in Inerrancy and Worldview: Answering Modern Challenges to the Bible. Unlike Beale’s The Erosion of Inerrancy in Evangelicalism, where the book primarily addresses the writings of Peter Enns, Poythress spends most of his time looking at the worldview that shapes the challenges against inerrancy. Inerrancy and Worldview certainly contains interaction with a variety of authors and leading voices, but the primary focus is on the thinking that Poythress believes brings about rejection of inerrancy.
This approach is somewhat unique. I think most discussions about the nature of Scripture as God’s inspired word certainly include issues related to world views, but I’m unaware of any works that focus primarily on that issue. Poythress is to be commended for such a creative (and wise!) approach.
Throughout Inerrancy and Worldview, Poythress works off of the following definition of inerrancy:
“[Scripture] is completely true in what it says, and makes no claims that are not true.”
Critics may take issue with a statement like this, but it’s important to recognize that Poythress is coming from an authorial intent hermeneutic. Thus, he is not arguing that the Bible teaches that the world is flat or a box (that’s why, in my opinion, the term inerrancy must always include a discussion on hermeneutics). What Poythress is chiefly concerned with is attacks upon the functional truthfulness and functional authority of Scripture.
There are many challenges to inerrancy, and they come from a variety of worldviews. For Poythress, he addresses a wide variety of issues under this heading:
- Challenges from Science and Materialism
- Challenges from History
- Challenges about Language
- Challenges from Sociology and Anthropology
- Challenges from Psychology
- Challenges from Examples
- Challenges from Our Attitudes
- Challenges from Corrupt Spirituality
Wise readers will recognize that Poythress’ work will help Christians because it is not simply a focus upon the insider issue of inerrancy among evangelicals. Inerrancy and Worldview is much broader than that. Attacks upon the authority of Scripture come from a variety of worldviews and from different angles. Thus, Poythress believes that we need to consider the worldview and interact with how it shapes human thinking.
The book is written well and at an understandable level for most Christians, and is more apologetic in nature that I thought it would. What I mean is that it’s written in a way that will probably help some Christians defend their beliefs about Scripture with their family, friends, and co-workers. For instance, when Poythress is answer the question about what we should do with apparent contradictions, discrepancies, or Bible difficulties, he writes,
“I would say that we deal with them in ways such as what I have attempted in this book. We try to exercise patience; we ask the Lord to help us to understand; we try to reckon with the fact that the world we live in is God’s world, over which he rules personally. We should also trust that God is faithful, even in cases where we do not yet understand.”
I believe this is good pastoral advice. There’s both an acknowledgement of the necessity to do our homework and study hard and not move quickly beyond the issues in question. Yet we also have to acknowledge our finiteness and remember who God is.
Luke is a pastor-theologian living in northern California, serving as a co-lead pastor with his life, Dawn, at the Red Bluff Vineyard. Father of five amazing kids, when Luke isn’t hanging with his family, reading or writing theology, he moonlights as a fly fishing guide for Confluence Outfitters. He blogs regularly at LukeGeraty.com and regularly contributes to his YouTube channel.